Functional programming supports programming languages like Lisp, Clojure, Wolfram, Erlang, Haskell, F , R, and other prominent languages. Functional programming is great for data science work. Object-oriented programming: Object Oriented programming OOP is a programming paradigm that relies on the concept of classes and objects. It is used to structure a software program into simple, reusable pieces of code blueprints usually called classes , which are used to create individual instances of objects.
Object-oriented programming is about creating objects that contain both data and functions. A class is an abstract blueprint used to create more specific, concrete objects.
Classes define what attributes an instance of this type will have, like color, but not the value of those attributes for a specific object. Classes can also contain functions, called methods available only to objects of that type. These functions are defined within the class and perform some action helpful to that specific type of object.
In functional programming, a function is the primary manipulation unit. In object-oriented, an object is the primary manipulation unit. Functional programming provides high performance in processing large data for applications. Object-oriented programming is not good for big data processing.
Functional programming does not support conditional statements. In Object-oriented programming, conditional statements can be used like if-else statements and switch statement. It is just an object corresponding to a class with a single method. Very few development teams will change their software or way of writing applications just to switch from one approach to the other.
It is more likely for a team to actively refactor some of their most essential applications to use more recent features of their programming languages. Either way, the future looks increasingly hybrid. Certain types of applications favor FP like compilers , while others are more suited for using OOP principles like classic desktop applications.
Choosing the right programming approach depends on several factores, like the target programming language, framework, and type of application you are building. Use what you feel is most comfortable,but do not forget to keep on learning to add to your toolbelt. It is always beneficial to have plenty of choices when tackling a problem.
Angel Rivera Developer Advocate. Waweru Mwaura Software Engineer. By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You should receive an automated response notifying you that we received your info. Someone from our Enterprise team will be reaching out to you shortly.
Start Building for Free. Showing results for:. Functional programming Functional programming FP is one of the oldest kinds of programming, maybe even the oldest. So what does that all mean? Key concepts in functional programming First, it is important to understand that functions are first-class citizens in FP, which means they are treated like any other value. Use cases for functional programming Although it was originally used mostly in scientific applications, FP has become increasingly popular in a variety of fields.
Object-oriented programming Functional programming has been around a long time, but some developers consider object-oriented programming OOP to be even more traditional. Read on for descriptions of important principles in OOP and some of its most common uses cases. Key concepts in object-oriented programming In OOP, developers model software applications as collections of objects that can communicate with one another. Functional vs object-oriented programming: the debate As already discussed, both approaches have their benefits and pitfalls.
Looking into the future Almost all popular programming languages are multiparadigm. Ongoing support for object-oriented programming In this context, why should OOP still be a viable choice? Finding common ground Very few development teams will change their software or way of writing applications just to switch from one approach to the other. Conclusion Certain types of applications favor FP like compilers , while others are more suited for using OOP principles like classic desktop applications.
Similar posts you may enjoy. Tutorials Infrastructure as Code, part 2: build Docker images and deploy to Kubernetes with Terraform Nov 9, 22 min read. Tutorials Infrastructure as Code, part 1: create a Kubernetes cluster with Terraform Nov 8, 13 min read.
In comparison, functions are "free" , meaning they can be on any other scope of the code, not belonging to classes or objects. Therefore, a method is always a function, but a function is not always a method.
When objects contain properties and methods that work closely together, those objects belong to the same class. In an OOP language, code is written to define the classes and, consequently, the respective objects.
Pure object-oriented languages follow the four core principles : encapsulation, abstraction, inheritance, and polymorphism. Let's start by focusing on encapsulation. Encapsulation is highly important in OOP since it consists of the ability to encapsulate variables within a class from outside access. Properties and methods can be private or public.
OOP languages allow developers to establish multiple degrees of visibility. On the one hand, private features can only be visible for the class itself. On the other hand, public features can be visible to everyone. Inheritance is also extremely vital since it provides a mechanism to organized and structure the software. It allows classes to inherit states and behaviors from their superclasses, which also means that this principle supports reusability.
Object-oriented programming can support mutable data. Contrarily, functional programming uses immutable data instead. In both programming paradigms, an immutable object refers to an object whose state cannot be modified once created.
A mutable object consists of exactly the opposite; an object's state can be modified even after being created. In pure functional programming languages e. Thus, objects are typically immutable.
In OOP languages, the answer is not that straightforward since it depends more on the specifications of each OOP language. String and concrete objects can be expressed as immutable objects in order to improve runtime efficiency as well as readability. Plus, immutable objects can be very helpful when handling multi-threaded applications because it avoids the risk of the data being changed by other threads. Mutable objects also have their advantages. They allow developers to make changes directly in the object without allocating it, saving time and speeding up the project.
However, it is up to the developer and the development team to decide whether it actually pays off according to the project's objectives. For instance, mutation can also open more doors for bugs, but sometimes its speed is very suitable and even necessary. Therefore, OOP can support mutability, but its languages may also allow for immutability. For example, in Java, the strings are immutable objects.
Nonetheless, Java also has mutable versions of strings. Another good example is Python, which has built-in types that are immutable e. For instance, Python is one of the most popular languages, and it truly is a multi-paradigm language.
Thus, it can entail a more functional or OOP approach according to the developers' preference. A favorite example is compilers, where source and intermediate languages change seldom mostly the same things , but compiler writers are always adding new translations and code improvements or optimizations new operations on things. Compilation and translation more generally are "killer apps" for functional languages.
You don't necessarily have to choose between the two paradigms. You can write software with an OO architecture using many functional concepts.
FP and OOP are orthogonal in nature. Take for example C. If you consider Linq , the most important constructs that permit Linq to exist are functional in nature: lambda expressions. Another example, F. You can define classes, abstract classes, interfaces, deal with inheritance. You can even use mutability when it makes your code clearer or when it dramatically increases performance. Functional Programming for Everyday. A great article although poorly formatted showing many techniques and practical, real-world examples of FP on C.
A great book that deals mainly with FP concepts, trying to explain what they are, when they should be used. There are many examples in both F and C. Also, Petricek's blog is a great source of information. Functional Programming, in Haskell or even in Scala, can allow substitution through more general mechanism of type classes. Mutable internal state is either discouraged or forbidden. Encapsulation of internal representation can also be achieved. See Haskell vs OOP for a good comparison.
Norman's assertion that "Adding a new kind of thing to a functional program may require editing many function definitions to add a new case. If Pattern Matching on a particular Abstract Data Type is spread throughout a codebase, you will indeed suffer from this problem, but it is perhaps a poor design to start with. In Scala, type classes are encoded with implicit parameters, not conversions, although implicit conversions are another means to acheiving substitution of compatible types.
If you're in a heavily concurrent environment, then pure functional programming is useful. The lack of mutable state makes concurrency almost trivial.
0コメント