Leaders also support the goal of protecting 30 per cent of land and oceans by The G20 commitment to a minimum 15 per cent level of taxation for large global multinationals is a breakthrough, even though it will have to be legislated around the world through tax laws and revisions of tax treaties.
Also significant is the shift in the taxation of digital profits being based on the place of consumption and not the place of physical production. On COVID , the G20 merely accompanies the growing mobilisation of the private sector, the United States, China and others around the world to reach a 70 per cent vaccination rate by mid This codification of global targets is useful.
The commitment to meaningful reforms and a budget increase of the World Health Organization and reforms of the International Health Regulations is a key move in the right direction.
Despite strong adverse currents, the Rome G20 Summit played a positive role in inserting common energy to counteract the growing entropy of global politics and coordinate various global actors toward common goals. As for the incongruous, the prize goes to the photo of G20 leaders without Joe Biden throwing coins backward into the Trevi fountain , for collective good luck. This was not the best message to reassure the world that the G20 leaders know what they are doing.
East Asia Forum welcomes comments, both for adding depth to analysis and for bringing up important new issues. Original comments adding insight and contributing to analysis are especially encouraged. Report an error. Editorial code of conduct.
Skip to main content. Campbell Clark. Bookmark Please log in to bookmark this story. Log In Create Free Account. The Globe and Mail. These gatherings involve cabinet ministers, their deputies and technical staff. There are also meetings of representatives of non-state actors such as business, labour, think tanks, youth, and civil society groupings in the 20 countries.
First, the G20 leaders are not a stable group. For example, ten of the participants in the summit have already lost or will lose power by the July summit in Germany. This suggests that the G20 works well when all the leaders are focused on resolving the same crisis. For example, the leaders responded effectively during the acute phase of the global financial crisis. Their actions helped prevent a global depression and they created a new organisation — the Financial Stability Board — to help correct deficiencies in international financial regulatory standards.
But once the acute phase of the financial crisis was over the differences in policy perspectives of the key participating countries reasserted themselves. As a result reaching agreement among the G20 countries has become more difficult. This has been further exacerbated by the resurgence of sovereignty among G20 countries. Until recently the world seemed slowly to be creating an international community. America will have to offer concessions as well as make demands, such as giving up on the dangerous, counterproductive idea of bringing Kiev into NATO.
However, diplomatic solutions seem unlikely if the United States and Russia are not even talking. He was supposed to be posing for photos—and awkwardly returned a few minutes later. But he found that his fellow leaders still were not bedazzled by his leadership.
Far worse was Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi murderer and liar also known as the crown prince. While he did not receive the usual rapturous welcome for a Saudi royal with cash to spend not only on munitions, but also yachts and chateaus , his presence was a deep embarrassment. MbS was neither a threat, like Putin, who had to be dealt with, nor an ally, like most of the other G20 members, who needed to be accommodated. Instead, Riyadh was a geopolitical problem, the destabilizing troublemaker which it claimed Iran to be, as well as a human rights affront, lacking the class and good grace to preserve even a hint of deniability for its crimes to protect the public sensitivities of its nominal friends.
Still, the kingdom remained too wealthy to be treated appropriately by democratic leaders, with contempt and disdain. The compromise: a position for MbS in the group photo at the extreme edge, which offered his betters an opportunity to crop him out for official publications.
Perhaps most importantly, his presence reminded everyone that the gathering represented only an arbitrary ranking of economic size, with neither the authority nor credibility to do anything meaningful.
0コメント